The integration between them is our job, not your risk.
The argument
Every embedded design house publishes a list like this one, so the list is not the argument. The argument is span: PCB, firmware, BSP, control and connectivity held by the same engineers, so a control-loop bug is a debugging session, not a negotiation between three suppliers.
When the board house, the firmware contractor and the BSP vendor are separate companies, you own the integration. The board blames the firmware, the firmware blames the BSP, and the schedule moves right by weeks while nobody is accountable. Holding the whole stack removes that seam.
Boards designed for signal integrity, power and manufacture from the first schematic sheet.
Firmware written against the board we designed, so a driver bug is traced to the wire, not a datasheet guess.
Reproducible Yocto builds with licence compliance and update signing done first, not deferred until expensive.
Open- and closed-loop control with the determinism budget — jitter, latency, failure behaviour — stated up front.
Operator interfaces measured in frame time and input latency, on the panel the product actually ships with.
Field protocols behave badly; the gateway is where that gets handled, with buffering that survives a dropped link.
Every stage from sensor to display gets a number, so the argument about where the latency lives ends early.
Field devices onto a network, provisioned with identity and an update path that still works in year five.
Standards worked toThe standards a programme has to meet are agreed at the start and written into the scope — EMC and safety testing, sector requirements, and the evidence pack each one needs. The specific set for your programme, and the certificates we already hold, are shared on request.
Bring a schematic, a requirement, or a problem you cannot place. A real engineer answers.